Login to post a new forum topic.
SW?
 |
|
|
Just to be clear...I have a lot of of SW pictures, would posting them here get anyone's panties in a twist? If it helps, the SW pics of mine ALWAYS have a normal sized woman not guy. So technically it could sort of kind of be considered GTS. LOL __________________
|
|
SW?
*wrinkles nose*
~Jenn
~Jenn
This is a good question... I also have some SW (Shrunken Woman) pics, although they do have actual size men in the pics. To me that's not a problem, since I'm not homophobic. I'm "straight" in may sexual orientation, but I'm not shocked by a masculin presence in a SW pic, as I am obviously not in a GTS pic. To work a GTS pic often needs the tiny man as her counterpart, so why should SW not work the same way... Naturally, I also like SW pics with actual size women interacting.
http://www.thanatosgts.com
So that's one for one against. Personally if a woman is bigger than a man OR a woman it's GTS related in my book. I know purists would rather the woman be bigger than normal sized to be considered GTS, but half if not more of the GTS pics and video clips are just a normal sized woman enforcing a larger size scale to a smaller person.
But if the moderator here just wants GTS with no F/f then so be it. Just trying to help a database that seems a bit, understocked so to speak. LOL
My part of the fantasy involves small men and not small women. That's all its a good question and you'll have to get cmb's opinion on it.
~Jenn
~Jenn
For right now it's open. When space becomes an issue, I may start asking folks to curb down the SW stuff first.
CMB
The floodgates have been opened...RELEASE THE HOUNDS!
cool... I have alot of pics I made... some SW, and some SM...
I'm going to post some right now...
personally, i love the SW stuff. I have always been into GTS, but I have to admit, the idea of the shoe being on the other foot is enticing as well